1. Avebury, a picturesque village in Wiltshire, is home to the largest stone circle in Britain. That circle, a complex geometric ring based on Pythagorean triangles, was explicitly crafted to incorporate a vast 750-megalithic-yard-radius arc designed to function as an antenna perfectly aligned with the northernmost rising moon. The awe-inspiring secret to creating such a large radius lies in the ancient geometry developed almost five thousand years ago on Windmill Hill. The majestic Windmill Hill overlooks Avebury from one mile to its northwest.
The Chalk Massive, located south of Swindon, is impressive, towering over 500 feet high. This formation stretches from England's southern coast to its east coast. The chalk was formed beneath the sea millions of years ago. Early folks were attracted to the Chalk Massive and used it as a whiteboard to practice their beloved geometry. This geometry was designed to bring the sun, the moon and a star or stars together in various attempts to avoid their harsh winters.
2. Approximately 5,700 years ago, a significant event occurred in the history of human civilisation. Before the iconic Stonehenge was even a thought, the people of Windmill Hill undertook a monumental task. They dug a two-metre-deep ring ditch to form a 450 megalithic-yard-long pure white egg shape. (1225 feet, 373 metres).
This geometric wonder, which can be scaled up or down, was based on triangles with circles of diameters 375 and 325 placed 100 megalithic yards apart. The blend radius between the circles was an impressive 375 megalithic yards.
The egg on top of Windmill Hill is a testament to early peoples' advanced understanding of geometry and a significant milestone in our understanding of prehistoric cultures. As mentioned, this geometry was transferred to the nearby Avebury, where several monoliths formed an antenna aimed at the moon. This 750 MY arc runs between points M and F in picture 1.
3. Avebury is shown with a twice-size WH egg.
Our analysis of the geometry of Avebury's outer ring of stones sheds light on the progressive evolution of architectural techniques. The builders' initial attempts, dating back to 3,700 BC, were grand in scale. However, after discovering the cord and sagitta method, their approach was simplified, which avoids drawing arcs from their centre points. Avebury people could now construct a moon-aligned antenna with a 750 radius by upscaling the WH egg to give a 244 MY cord with a 10 MY sagitta.
Professor Alexander Thom’s sharp eye for detail and excellent surveying skills helped him uncover the intricate geometry of Avebury. His work is justifiably recognised for depicting Avebury's image and the effort required to comprehend it. However, it's unfortunate that he failed to notice or chose to ignore the 30:40:50 triangle at its centre.
We will have more to say about Windmill Hill, but let's now consider Avebury's Cove.
4. A 2021 survey of Avebury’s Cove.
This picture of Avebury's main cove is shown along with a couple of stones that remain of its Northern Circle - one stone at the extreme left and the other at the extreme right. The Cove once consisted of three large stones, or megaliths, arranged in a ‘U’ shape, like an open-sided box.
Covestone 2, in the middle of the picture, is often referred to as the 'Backstone.' Archaeologists thought this stone to have been erected upright around five thousand years ago, and it is the earliest and largest stone on the site.
Covestone 1 is the slim stone to the right of the Backstone.
The missing Covestone 3, which once stood to the left of the Backstone, had fallen or was pulled down in 1716 and smashed to pieces before being whisked away for other purposes by Avebury’s villagers in 1720. Doctor William Stukeley described Covestone 3 as similar in size and appearance to Covestone 1.
Opinions have varied on the Cove’s astronomical alignment. Some have claimed that it opens out towards the summer solstice of the sun. Others say it aims at the northernmost moonrise at Major Standstill. Such confusing opinions prompted me to make several visits to the Cove to make more sense of it.
5. My first survey, published in “Stonehenge Secrets 2007," showed that its two remaining stones are precisely 90 degrees apart. This photograph shows my 90-degree triangle of string, which I placed between Covestone 1 and the Backstone as proof.
6. Mid-summer sunrise at Avebury's Main Cove in 2009.
White tapes were carefully placed against the sides of Covestone 1 and parallel to the Cove’s axis. In a further attempt to align with this stone, a few menus from the Red Lion pub were also positioned parallel to it, although their contribution to the research was minimal.
With all the necessary preparations in place, including the tapes and menus and a camera poised for action, the Druid and I eagerly awaited the sun's ascent. We were filled with anticipation.
I got the photograph I wanted and put it on the front cover of a leaflet, which I produced and presented to the six major libraries in 2010, “The Real Avebury” ISBN 978-0-95533012-6-1.
The photograph proves that the Cove aims about five degrees further north than the solstice. And since the northernmost moonrise at Major Standstill is about nine degrees further north than the solstice, the Cove is aimed midway between the two. The Druid conveniently marks this 18.61-year event.
And the Major Standstill is upon us now, 2024-25.
During a standstill, the moon swings wildly from north to south around every fortnight for six months to produce several chances for photography. Weather permitting, of course!
Starting from September, the northernmost moonrise will show for one or two days every month until March 2025. People who stay overnight might also be able to watch the corresponding northernmost moonset over Windmill Hill. Azimuth 320.
During these critical six months, the moon will also display its southern-most moonrises. The southern-most rising moon - Azimuth 140/141, on a flat horizon, proves Avebury's West Kennet Avenue of paired stones as a female connection to the timber and stone circle known as the Sanctuary.
The southernmost moonset from the East Kennet long barrow, where the moon descends into an extensive valley, should also be worth photographing - Azimuth 220.
For charts telling the time and date of these moonrises and moon sets, I refer to the site...timeanddate.
7.
This photo was taken shortly after the solstice sunrise in 2009 and from a different position. This and the following picture prove that Avebury folk were not so interested in the exact point of the solstice as to what takes place a short while later.
These findings have profound implications for other monuments, too, particularly Stonehenge. Stonehenge’s 50-degree axis is one degree clockwise from the Neolithic solstice, which challenges the traditional views on Stonehenge's alignment.
8.
The inner face of Covestone 2 -- The “Backstone” shortly after sunrise.
I had my solstice photograph and was about to leave when the druid called me over. “You are missing the best bit,” he cried. “Come over here and look at this.”
“What am I looking for?” I inquired.
“Never mind that -- you just keep clicking away at that camera.”
And so, I did.
Early folks had not altered this stone by flattening and polishing it, but it hardly matters because a few minutes after sunrise, when the sun escapes the earth's atmosphere, it gives off a beautiful rosy-red glow that no one should miss. Imagine what it would look like if cleaned free of lichen to expose the myriad of quartz crystals in its structure! Avebury folks used this stone as a mirror to join the sun and moon in “Astronomical Intercourse.
*****
Several excavations around the bases of the Cove’s two remaining sarsens have been performed over the years. But the deepest was made in 2003 when ripe-husk-free barley seed was found against the base of the Backstone's outer face in a rescue attempt to prevent the stone from toppling over.
Neolithic folks had placed these seeds knowing they possessed the essence of life, and depositing them at the base of the Backstone displays a wish that the Backstone might grow.
9.
If a stone would benefit from a good scrubbing, this one would!
Few things archaeological can be proved beyond doubt. The alignment of Avebury's Cove is one of the exceptions. That is why I made another visit on the 20th of September 2021, with a crude Tee-square and affixed compass, to reaffirm the alignment I had found in 2009. It did. The compass showed the azimuth of the Backstone to be about 48 degrees and midway between the sun and moon's northernmost risings.
10.
The Tee-square proved the inner face of the Backstone to have a slight convex bow, and it was therefore placed in the middle of the stone to give an average result.
We should expect the moon, in late 2024 or early 2025, to rise out of the notch in the horizon between the tallest tree and the stone on the left. This bulbous stone is female gender, as no doubt was the whole Northern Circle and every stone in it.
Furthermore, while describing stone rings as circles is convenient, Avebury’s Northern Circle was not circular but egg-shaped. That egg points west towards the equinox, where the setting sun and moon slide down the side of the beautiful Cherhill Hill.
11. Archaeologists ground plan of Avebury's Cove. REF: Archaeological excavations at the Cove, 2003.
Serving to confuse more than to enlighten, this plan solves nothing. The five-metre scale is hopelessly inaccurate, and the north arrow is 30 degrees out. And all for the benefit of deceiving you and me. But don't blame the young archaeologists who are controlled by an authoritative regime and have mortgages to pay; blame the whole sorry mess that is archaeology today.
“Archaeology in Britain is a shambles from top to bottom.” The late Professor Mick Aston of the Time Team.
Mick was the only archaeologist to speak against his beloved trade but did not live to enjoy his retirement.
So here we have another archaeological Red Herring designed to put honest researchers off. And it doesn't bode well when trying to resolve Avebury's second cove to be found in Longstone's field near the village of Beckhampton.
The Longstone's Cove, or what is left of it, lies alongside the prehistoric Beckhampton Avenue of stone that once entered the Avebury henge via its western causeway.
******
Avebury's henge has long been known to be an internal device... 'I observed further that as these stones generally have a rough and a smoother side, they took care to place the most sightly side of the stone inward, towards the included area.' Avebury, a temple to the British Druids. Stukeley W, 1727.
Professor Atkinson said the same thing about Stonehenge...'The main concern of the builders was to produce a presentable finish on those surfaces which would be seen from the interior of the site - the exception being the great trilithon.' Stonehenge, page 121. Atkinson R, 1956.
A recent archaeological entry in Wikipedia concurs.
The conclusion must be that Avebury and Stonehenge are internal devices.
12. These triangles are proportional to 3:4:5 - The most basic of Pythagorean triangles.
Having established that the Cove in the middle of Avebury's Northern stone ring is rectangular, we next wanted to know the distance between Covestone 1 and the extant Covestone 3 - and do so without resorting to an archaeological excavation to determine the position of the hole in which Covestone 3 once stood. Fortunately, we only had to estimate this distance to the nearest Megalithic Yard. (32.664 imperial inches / 0.83 metres)
The Tee-square was sat on the grass and once more up against the inner face of the Backstone. And with the help of a friendly day-tripper from Dudley, we positioned the T-square, by common consent, to be in the middle of the stone. A measurement was then taken from the inner face of Covestone 1 to the Tee-square of sixteen feet six inches. This figure was doubled to obtain a distance between Covestones 1 and 3 of thirty-three feet, which converts to 12 Megalithic Yards.
Next, we estimated the distance from the inner face of the Backstone to the centre of Covestone 1. This was four megalithic yards -- which, when doubled -- gave eight in all.
These rough measurements show that Avebury's Cove is set on an eight by twelve megalithic-yard rectangle. This gives the Cove...
* Sixty-four half-size Pythagorean triangles.
* Sixteen full-size triangles measuring 3, 4, and 5 Megalithic Yards.
* Four twice-size triangles that measure 6, 8, and 10 Megalithic Yards.
So, the unequivocal Stone Age aim was for the Cove to grow exponentially -- Just like a child.
*****
Avebury’s Cove is akin to baking a cake. Apart from numerics and three-sided triangles, which are known to represent the family, other Ingredients are --- Barley and Wheat seeds, which hold life dormant until fertilised by the sun and rain, semen, infant burials, and other unknown stuff.
Next: Geometry with "corners." Avebury's outer circuit of stones.
13. Avebury's Cove is correctly placed in the middle of the so-called 'Northern Circle of Stones, which is not a perfect circle like shown but an equinoctial-aligned egg-shaped formation. William Stukeley observed its destruction in 1720 and referred to this egg as a "Lunar Temple."
We have shown the northern circle as a circle by being placed against four known stones and the Southern Circle against its eight. However, we can demonstrate that these are not circular but oval. Nevertheless, it is better to leave the problem of these eggs behind for a while so we can concentrate on Avebury’s outer circuit.
******
Much of the following is thanks to a survey by Professor Alexander Thom, assisted by Brigadier A. Prain and Miss E. M. Pickard.
Thom's survey showed that the outer circuit was based on at least one 3:4:5 triangle. "Megalithic Sites in Britain by A Thom, Oxford University Press 1967."
Aerial photographs of Avebury are now available on Google Earth and Bing Maps. These images show the precise positions of Avebury's megaliths and concrete plinths that have replaced the missing stones. However, the vertical alignment of Google's image was slightly off and required a minor correction. As a result, the image was adjusted to match Thom's surveyed measurements between Stone16 and 68 and Stone1 and 50. This method helped to scale down the internal stone settings rather than scaling them up, which is the less accurate approach typically used by archaeologists.
According to the C.A.D. (computer-aided design) analysis, Thom's survey had no significant issues. However, some minor adjustments were made by slightly moving certain circles to align with the actual positions of the stones. This indicates the need for a modern GPS survey to be conducted. Additionally, as Avebury is an inward-facing structure, measurements should be taken against the inside surfaces of the stones rather than their centres, as Alexander Thom had done.
14. Professor Alexander Thom must be congratulated for resolving the geometry of Avebury’s outer ring of megaliths while dealing with its axis of 42 degrees clockwise from the north, for this was no easy task.
So, it's thanks to Thom that we can set Avebury's geometry to normal, as seen above, which makes our job more straightforward!
Now, you might think that all this is entirely down to the work of Professor Thom. It is not. It's essentially the same, but Thom failed to find or omitted the second 30:40:50 triangle and the 250 MY radius cast from its corner F.
Thom did believe in a second triangle, though, and had he found it -- or deliberately overlooked it -- he'd have known that it led to lots more, as is demonstrated by the mass of Pythagorean triangles inscribed (for fun) on a gold plate, shown next.
15. Avebury’s early residents probably realised the vast number of triangles proportional to 3:4:5, which comprised the rectangle seen above. They probably produced it on a gold sheet measuring seven-and-a-half by ten megalithic inches like the Stonehengers did when they made their nine-megalithic-inch-long lozenge of gold, which they placed across the chest of the Bush Barrow Man while burying him in a round barrow to the south of Stonehenge.
The above geometry is another reason that made Avebury a popular venue, which drew people from miles around to help build the outer circuit of some ninety-nine stones. Pro Thom thought ninety-eight. Others say one hundred. But, hey, who is arguing?
16.
Having marked out stages A and B, Avebury folk next cast a 750-radius arc from a post 550 Megalithic Yards from D of the small triangle. Well, that’s the theory!
We can see from Stage D that a cord 244 megalithic yards long, when stretched across a 750-radius circle, stands off the arc by ten megalithic yards. We get this by doubling the 375 MY arc of the outer ring, an egg, scribed across the top of Windmill Hill.
The eye can quickly improve this ample curve even when using very few pegs to produce it.
17. Moel ty Ucha: From "Megalithic sites in Britain" by A Thom. Llandrillo, Bala, Wales.
Moel ty Ucha is based on two pentagons.
This is just one of Professor Thom's many surveys that tries to fool us. Many more like this can be found on our sister site, StonehengeOlogy.com
18. Kerry Pole stone circle. From "Megalithic Sites in Britain" by A Thom. Near Newton Pow, Wales.
Professor Alexander Thom produced geometry that passed through the centre of the stones when he should have worked to their inside faces. This was commonplace with Thom, which means that almost every one of his 500 stone circle surveys requires correction.
So far, I have corrected eight of the most important and will drop them into convenient slots as I've done with those above.
Kelly Pole respects the smallest of Pythagorean triangles, 3, 4 and 5, but in linear form, with circle centre spacings of 3, 4, and 5. Clever.
Furthermore, it has what Professor Thom called "corners" when referring to his survey of Avebury's outer ring.
19. HIRNANT EGG-SHAPED RING CAIRN, MID-WALES.
Based on an arrowhead, the geometry that Hirnant's stones are based on proved especially difficult to resolve because all measurements are in Megalithic Inches.
20. Logic dictates. The Ordinance Survey looked for depressions and fiery pits over which Avebury’s stones were felled in preparation for their destruction. So, their survey did not show where the stones once stood. The OS plot is, therefore, only valuable for suggesting that the internal circles, north and south, are anything but circular. And while it might be years before archaeologists prove that the northern and southern rings are egg-shaped, I see no reason for assuming those eggs and their founding geometry to have appeared as shown above.
These eggs are a variation on a theme. Both are based on the same-size simple three-times-size 3:4:5 triangle but are orientated in diverse ways. The Northern egg, shown pink, with an axis length of 248 MY, is three megalithic yards smaller than the southern egg at 251 MY, as is expected from a female entity.